Today, the House of Representatives passed the
American Clean Energy And Security Act of 2009 to reduce the United States' greenhouse gas emissions (GHGe) and encourage more renewable energy generation. 

This bill will establish a cap and trade system this will place a limit of the amount GHGe manufacturers and energy providers can emit within a year by giving these industries pollution permits or allowances.

The manufacturers and energy providers that exceed their pollution permits can trade pollution permits amongst themselves in order to avoid fines.

The cap on GHGe would increase over the years, which would in turn increase the price of emissions and driving these industries to find cleaner ways of making energy and products.

The bill has a goal of reducing GHGe in the United States to 17 percent below 2005 levels by 2020, and 83 percent by 2050.

In 2005, the United States emitted 7, 256.9 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent.  In 2007, the United States emitted 7,282.4 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent.

This bill is the first real step that the United States has taken to actually address the dangers of climate change.   It is by no means a perfect bill with all of its special pork projects, but it does create more momentum for the sustainability movement. 

Once we achieve enough momentum, we will be unstoppable just like the Juggernaut.  The key to achieve this is to keep up pressure on our government representatives. 

We must make sure that Congress and President Obama are designing policies that will encourage more sustainable and renewable energy technologies that will protect God's green earth and allow the citizen's of the United States to lead productive and effective lives.

Download the full bill here and read more here. 

Energy Secretary Steven Chu said today that the Obama administration's budget will not contain any funding for developing hydrogen powered vehicles.

It seems that the Obama administration wants to focus on alternative energy technology that can be developed quickly.  Right now, plug-in hybrids and all-electric vehicles right winning the popularity contest.

Both technologies, however, have serious infrastructure issues that must be address before we will see a national wide adoption.

The main barriers to plug-in hybrids and all-electric vehicles are the production of lithium batteries, recharging time, recharging stations, and the vehicle range.

The main barriers to hydrogen powered vehicle are the production of hydrogen and fuel cells, the distribution of hydrogen, and the on board vehicular storage of hydrogen (300 mile range). 

For MS, I worked at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) to design and test hydrogen storage technologies.   

The team created a cryogenic capable pressure vessel (CCPV) that can store 10.7 kg of liquid hydrogen.  This system was tested in a Toyota Prius in January 2007 and it achieved a 653 mile range.

Lets not forget that both technologies are just passing the buck when it coming to emissions.

Most of the hydrogen produced in the United States is made from the steam reformation of natural gas (methane).  Currently, ~ 49% of the electricity produced in the US comes from coal-fired plants. 

While I agree that it is probably easier and less costly to set up the infrastructure for plug-in hybrids and all-electric vehicles, I still do not believe this is the best way forward.

Right now, the Telsa Roadster can travel 244 miles (393 km) without external loads on the battery, i.e. no A/C running, no radio turned on, no phone or Ipod charging,......   You get the picture.

Furthermore, it takes 3.5 hours to fully recharge the Roadster.  When I think about the usage phase of a car, electric vehicles just don't appeal to me.  The recharge time is too long for my preferences and I am unsure about the actual range of these vehicle under "normal" stop and go driving conditions.  

The system design at LLNL was flexibly refuelable.   The CCPV can store compressed hydrogen gas at room temperature, compressed hydrogen gas at 80 degrees K (all gases occupy less volume at colder temperatures), and liquid hydrogen (LH2) at 20.28 K.

This allows a user to decide which fuel type they need based off of driving requirements and cost.  If users wanted to travel short distances (~120 miles), they could choose hydrogen at room temperature.  This is the cheapest to produce, but you store less hydrogen in the system.

If users wanted to travel further than 300 miles, they choose LH2.  It is the most expensive to produce but you store more in the system for extended ranges: ~300 to ~500 miles.  The refuel system is similar to the current gasoline system and can be completed under 5 minutes.

I would be a raging supporter of electric vehicles if (1) the electricity comes form renewable energy sources, (2) the recharging time was reduced to at least 30 mins, and (3) the range is equal to that of an internal combustion engine (300 miles or more).

Right now, I am for continuing development of both technologies and letting the range, cost, and emissions performance decide the winner. 

It is Earth Day today!!!

Our dear President Obama kicked it off with style by announcing that the federal government will open up its lands for projects that aim to produce electricity from wind and ocean currents.

This is another strong signal that President Obama recognizes that that the key to national security, economic security, economic prosperity,  energy independence, and sustainable living involves producing energy from sources other than fossil fuels.

Currently, ~ 49% of the electricity produced in the US comes from coal-fired plants.  The next biggest chunk comes from nuclear plants. 

There is significant amount of renewable energy available within the United States and it is high time we start using it and generating more jobs for Americans.

Producing electricity from renewables is not enough though.  We need to start implementing energy conservation and efficient programs and policies at the local and national level in tandem with renewable energy production.

It is much easier (and cheaper) to save a watt than it is to produce a watt.